Findings of the questionnaires

In conclusion from the answers to the questionnaire we draw the following conclusions. The new technologies, such as Learning Management Systems, in the monitoring organization are not widespread. Instead, some educational tools are used to facilitate them. Of course, such tools are evaluated and their superiority is noted for the improvement of the educational and research process. Very correct labels were noted for their proper use and the necessary functions that they need to cover. Based on the questionnaire findings, it is confirmed the importance and advantages of using LMSs.

For completeness, in the next, we present two indicative questions and they were answered by the partner universities. 

Question 1 

This question indicates whether there is agreement on the properties of the two LMS mentioned in the Moodle Superiority Conclusion. However, WARSAW UNIVERSITY pointed out that user-friendliness depends on the administration and deployment of the LMS. The table next shows the answers given. From this, we can conclude that after comparing the two best-known LMS, Moodle and Canvas, Moodle is superior to Canvas.

Questionnaire form

Question 

UN. GHEORGHE ASACHI

CHALMERS UNIVERSITY

UNIVERSUS

WARSAW UNIVERSITY

1

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Question 2 

At the moment there is no use of a learning management system based on the answers of the academic partners, of course there are several tools that are used now by the specific universities. Microsoft Teams and Google Meet are popular in UN. GHEORGHE ASACHI and few schools use Moodle. Of course, from the new year there is the prospect of all schools using Moodle in UN. GHEORGHE ASACHI. In CHALMERS UNIVERSITY their e-course platform is based on Canvas  and in WARSAW UNIVERSITY is based on Moodle. In UNIVERSUS they use Microsoft Teams. 

Questionnaire form

Question 

UN. GHEORGHE ASACHI

CHALMERS UNIVERSITY

UNIVERSUS

WARSAW UNIVERSITY

2

Νο

Yes

Νο

Yes